Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventative Gynecology Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medicinal Plants Research Center, School of Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran

3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research Development Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran


Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) affects 15-20% of term pregnancies. Recent studies have shown that MSAF has adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. There is no scientific consensus on the incidence of fetal distress in MSAF neonates, and most cesarean sections due to MSAF are unnecessary. The present study was conducted to assess umbilical artery blood pH in neonates with MSAF and to examine whether there is a relationship between MSAF and fetal distress. A clinical survey case-control was conducted on the neonates of 200 pregnant women admitted to a delivery unit of the obstetrics and Gynecology center in Amir al-Momenin Hospital, Zabol in 2014. Neonates born with MSAF made up the case group, and the control group consisted of neonates born with clear amniotic fluid. Umbilical cord arterial pH, gestational age, gender, mode of delivery, and one and five-minute Apgar scores were considered in both groups. The mean pH of the umbilical cord artery blood in the infants of the case group was 7.25, and the mean pH of the umbilical cord artery in the infants of the control group was 7.29 (P = 0.93). The mean gestational age in the case and control groups was 40.08 weeks and 38.32 weeks, respectively (P= 0.03). In this study, a cesarean delivery (P=0.001) and female gender (P= 0.016) were higher in the case group than in the control group. MSAF does not necessarily imply fetal distress, so urgent cesarean sections are unnecessary. This study showed that based on the acidity variables of the umbilical cord artery, there is no statistically significant correlation between the Apgar score at the 1st and 5th minute. While a significant difference has been observed between the type of delivery, gestational age and baby's gender.

Graphical Abstract

The comparison of umbilical cord artery pH in newborns with and without thick meconium stained amniotic fluid


Main Subjects

Selected author of this article by journal

ِDr. Nooshin Amjadi
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Google Scholar

Open Access

This article is licensed under a CC BY License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:


Publisher’s Note

CMBR journal remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afflictions.


Letters to Editor

Given that CMBR Journal's policy in accepting articles will be strict and will do its best to ensure that in addition to having the highest quality published articles, the published articles should have the least similarity (maximum 15%). Also, all the figures and tables in the article must be original and the copyright permission of images must be prepared by authors. However, some articles may have flaws and have passed the journal filter, which dear authors may find fault with. Therefore, the editor of the journal asks the authors, if they see an error in the published articles of the journal, to email the article information along with the documents to the journal office.

CMBR Journal welcomes letters to the editor ([email protected], [email protected]) for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Critical letters can be sent to the journal editor as soon as the article is online. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] There is no limit to the number of words in a letter.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include Name, Email Address, Affiliation, mobile phone number, and Comments.

[7] Letters will be answered as soon as possible.

  1. Kalra V, Leegwater AJ, Vadlaputi P, Garlapati P, Chawla S, Lakshminrusimha S (2022) Neonatal outcomes of non-vigorous neonates with meconium-stained amniotic fluid before and after change in tracheal suctioning recommendation. Journal of Perinatology 42 (6): 769-774. doi:
  2. Parween S, Prasad D, Poonam P, Ahmar R, Sinha A, Ranjana R, RANJANA R (2022) Impact of meconium-stained amniotic fluid on neonatal outcome in a tertiary hospital. Cureus 14 (4): e24464. doi:
  3. Phattraprayoon N, Tangamornsuksan W, Ungtrakul T (2021) Outcomes of endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition 106 (1): 31-38. doi:
  4. Strand M, Perlman JM Contemporary management of infants born through meconium stained amniotic fluid. In: Seminars in Perinatology, 2022. Elsevier, p 151625. doi:
  5. Gelfand SL, Fanaroff JM, Walsh MC (2004) Meconium stained fluid: approach to the mother and the baby. Pediatric Clinics 51 (3): 655-667. doi:
  6. Ahanya SN, Lakshmanan J, Morgan BL, Ross MG (2005) Meconium passage in utero: mechanisms, consequences, and management. Obstetrical & gynecological survey 60 (1): 45-56. doi:
  7. Alchalabi AA-H, E. El-Sunna, F. Zayed, Lf Badria, A. Obeidat2, H (1999) Meconium-stained amniotic fluid in term pregnancies-a clinical view. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 19 (3): 262-264. doi:
  8. Sharbaf FR, Amjadi N, Alavi A, Akbari S, Forghani F (2014) Normal and indeterminate pattern of fetal cardiotocography in admission test and pregnancy outcome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 40 (3): 694-699. doi:
  9. Neilson JP (2015) Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane database of systematic reviews(12). doi:
  10. Vandenbussche FP, Oepkes D, Keirse MJ (1999) The merit of routine cord blood pH measurement at birth. 27 (3): 158-165. doi:
  11. Brouillette RT, Waxman DH (1997) Evaluation of the newborn’s blood gas status. Clinical Chemistry 43 (1): 215-221. doi:
  12. Monfredini C, Cavallin F, Villani PE, Paterlini G, Allais B, Trevisanuto D (2021) Meconium aspiration syndrome: a narrative review. Children 8 (3): 230. doi:
  13. Hızlı D, Altınbaş ŞK, Köşüş N, Köşüş A, Ayyıldız A, Gelişen O, Kafalı H (2013) Is meconium stained amniotic fluid related to occult myocardial injury in term low risk pregnancies? Early Human Development 89 (3): 191-194. doi:
  14. Tayade S (2012) The significance of meconium stained amniotic fluid-a cross sectional study in a rural setup. IJBAR 3 (12): 861-866. doi:
  15. Mundhra R, Agarwal M (2013) Fetal outcome in meconium stained deliveries. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 7 (12): 2874. doi:
  16. Lee KA, Mi lee S, Jin Yang H, Park C-W, Mazaki-Tovi S, Hyun Yoon B, Romero R (2011) The frequency of meconium-stained amniotic fluid increases as a function of the duration of labor. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 24 (7): 880-885. doi:
  17. Choi W, Jeong H, Choi S-J, Oh S-Y, Kim J-S, Roh C-R, Kim J-H (2015) Risk factors differentiating mild/moderate from severe meconium aspiration syndrome in meconium-stained neonates. Obstetrics & gynecology science 58 (1): 24-31. doi: